English

Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement

The Editorial Board of „KRONOS” Philosophical Journal adheres to and acts according to the principles set out by the Committee on Publication Ethics.

The Editiorial Board uses „double-blind” peer-review system. Each submission is reviewed by 3 in-house editors. In the case of a positive review by at least 2 editors it is passed on to an external expert for further review and recommendation for publication. The Editorial Board guarantee protection of reviewers’s data and confidentiality of the submitted materials during the review process.

The Editorial Boards strongly condemns academic and scientific dishonesty, ghostwriting, plagiarism and auto-plagiarism. The Editors are obliged to carefully investigate any account of suspected misconduct and, if necessary, take appropriate measures to counter it in cooperation with the academic community. The Editors shall take reasonable steps to identify and prevent the publication of papers where research misconduct has occurred. In no case shall a publisher or editors encourage such misconduct, or knowingly allow such misconduct to take place. In the event that a journal’s publisher or editors are made aware of any allegations of research misconduct, the publisher or editor shall deal with allegations appropriately. The Editorial Board are willing to publish corrections, clarifications, retractions and apologies when needed.

Authors must grant exclusive copyright license to August Cieszkowski Foundation to publish their essays. Essays may be subsequently reprinted by the authors, providing that the previous publication in Kronos is properly acknowledged. All authors are considered equal regardless of their sex, race, nationality and religion.
Any complaints and appeals should be addresed to:
The Editors
KRONOS
Instytut Filozofii
Uniwersytet Warszawski
ul. Krakowskie Przedmieście 3
00–927 Warszawa
e-mail: use a contact form below